Thursday, April 2, 2026

🚨 History of Hizbia Digil Mirifle (HDMS)

            



     ﷽ ✍ #History

    🚨 History of Hizbia Digil Mirifle (HDMS)


What Southwest Leaders Told the World in 1948 and Why It Still Matters Today

In 1948, as Somalia’s future was being decided, the Four-Power Commission, representing the United States, Great Britain, the Soviet Union, and France, arrived in Mogadishu to hear from Somali communities.

Among those who spoke was Hizbia Digil Mirifle (HDMS), representing what is today Southwest Somalia.

On January 24, 1948, during the 15th Hearing, the delegation included Sheikh Abdullahi Mohamed “Begedi,” President and founder of HDMS, and Abukar Qassim, Vice President.


Sheikh Begedi spoke clearly on behalf of his people:

“I wish to request three things:

 1⃣ We want peace and security.  

 2⃣ We want our country to always be seen as belonging to us; we want to be consulted first.  

 3⃣ Others may live with us, but the land belongs to us.”

When asked if they would accept Italian administration, he replied:

“We were told there are 40 governments united together in the UN, and we would accept any that are good for us.”

      ✿ He added:-

“Under the Italian government, the country was safe, but labor was forced.”

He made it clear they would accept any administration except Ethiopia.

This record, preserved in United Nations archives, shows that HDMS was not pro-Italian, but pragmatic. They were seeking peace, dignity, and governance that respected their people.

Today, this history is not just the past, it is a warning.

There are growing concerns that authority is being pulled back to Mogadishu in ways that risk ignoring these same principles.

     ✿ For generations.

Southwest leaders and communities have asked for the same things:   

  ►Peace.

  ►Dignity.

  ►Consultation.

  ►Respect for their role in shaping their future.

These are not temporary political demands; they are long-standing principles.

Ignoring them risks repeating past mistakes.

Sustainable governance in Somalia cannot be built through centralization alone. 

It must rely on partnership, trust, and respect.

History has already spoken. 

The question is whether we are ready to listen.


With respect,  

Sheiknor Abucar Qassim

Thursday, March 19, 2026

Who is behind the removal of the Federal Republic of Somalia from the CONSTITUTION?

                 


          ﷽✍ #Failures 

πŸ’£ Who is behind the removal of the Federal Republic of Somalia from the CONSTITUTION

Badbado Consultant Bureau Has been investigating for 3 years

The conspiracy to destroy the constitution of the Federal Government of Somalia. 

We finally found out that these 3 countries are behind it!

1⃣ Turkey πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡· 

2⃣ Egypt πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¬ 

3⃣ Djibouti πŸ‡©πŸ‡― 

Of course, there were others who saw close interests in them.

However, the place where their advice was confused is that they never took into account the situation in Somalia. 

πŸ“ŒPeople surrounded by conflicts, 

πŸ“Œ No real reconciliation, 

πŸ“Œ Tribes are armed.

The military rule of 1969 - 1991 led to hatred for the country for a central government that would later concentrate power in one place. 

For this reason, they moved to a federal system. 

 Now the conspiracy of Ismail Omar Guelleh, πŸ‡©πŸ‡― Erdogan  πŸ‡ΉπŸ‡·and Al Sisi  πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡¬

Has collapsed, . 

And Somalia will return to indirect elections. 

It is time for Turkey, Djibouti and Egypt to get their hands off the internal affairs of Somalia

The others - who may be pursuing petty interests - should learn a lesson from this.

Friday, March 6, 2026

Targeting Religious Leaders:

 


  ﷽✍ #FactSheet 

Targeting Religious Leaders: A Dangerous Red Line That Wounds the Heart of the People!! 

Targeting religious leaders in conflict crosses a dangerous line.

 It can drive deeper divisions instead of bringing peace. When spiritual figures are attacked,

 The effects often go beyond politics into areas of faith, identity, and shared memory.


In Shia Islam, for instance, the Supreme Leader is not only a political figure but also a spiritual authority linked to a sacred lineage that traces back to Imam Ali and Imam Hussein. For many believers.

 This connection holds deep religious significance. Attacking such a figure can be seen not just as a political move, but as an attack on faith itself.

History shows that killing religious leaders rarely leads to the desired political result. Instead, it often strengthens movements through the strong symbolism of martyrdom. 

 In Shia tradition, shaped by the tragedy of Karbala in 680 CE, martyrdom turns loss into moral resistance.

 Rather than fracturing a community, such acts often unite followers, deepen their commitment, and elevate the fallen into lasting symbols of injustice.

Former U.S. Marine intelligence officer Scott Ritter once compared targeting a senior Shia religious figure to “killing the Pope” for Catholics. Whether one agrees with this analogy or not, it highlights the deep emotional and spiritual shock such an act could cause among millions of believers.

International humanitarian law stresses the protection of religious personnel under the Geneva Conventions and common principles like distinction and proportionality.

 Even in conflict, parties should differentiate between combatants and civilians and avoid actions that cause excessive harm or escalate broader conflict.

From Karbala to modern times, a clear pattern appears:- when sacred figures are targeted, political disputes can turn into religious struggles. When faith becomes part of the battlefield, diplomacy becomes harder and reconciliation becomes more remote.

This argument does not defend any government or ideology. It recognizes a bigger lesson from history: when religious authority is targeted, conflicts tend to intensify instead of resolve.

Lasting peace needs restraint. Protecting sacred boundaries might not end wars on its own, but violating them can make achieving peace much harder.



Badbado Consultant Bureau 



Saturday, January 31, 2026

﷽ ✍ Somalia’s Outcome ⚖️

       




                                              ¸Ψ¨ِΨ³ْΩ…ِ Ψ§Ω„Ω„َّΩ‡ِ Ψ§Ω„Ψ±َّΨ­ْΩ…َΩ†ِ Ψ§Ω„Ψ±َِّΩŠΩ…

﷽ ✍ Somalia’s Outcome ⚖️


Indeed, Somalia is stuck in a dilemma because its federal system is not clearly defined in the Constitution

An effective and stabilizing solution is to adopt regional autonomy with a clear division of powers.

⭕️ In this way, each region will independently manage:- 

✿ Its internal affairs

✿ Health.

✿ Education.

✿ Police.

✿ Coast Guard.

✿ Regional security forces. 

✿ Agriculture.

✿ Livestock, 

✿ Fisheries.

✿ Local taxes. 

✿ Budget.

✿ Service delivery, & 

✿ Regional elections.Through its own electoral commission.

 ⭕️ The federal government

will, in turn, retain exclusive powers over national responsibilities:

✿ Sovereignty and territorial integrity.

✿ Airspace and territorial waters, 

✿ National defense.

✿ Foreign affairs.

✿ Immigration and nationality, 

✿ Monetary policy.

✿ Customs.

✿ National revenue.

✿ Strategic natural resources.&

✿ Interregional coordination.

Such a clearly defined agreement will reduce political conflict. it will strengthen accountability.

It will respect unity, and transform federalism from a source of instability to an effective governance structure.

 It seems that HSM is playing a strategy of "escalating" the "Problems" in Somali politics.

But the bitter truth is.

Somalia is currently in a state of unprecedented political uncertainty and vulnerability. I doubt that such an escalation strategy.will ever work in Somalia.

We know from our history, escalation will lead to instability and deadly divisions. Common sense must prevail!

   Source:- Badbado Consultant Bureau

Monday, January 19, 2026

UAE (DPWorld ) betrayal in Sudan

        



   ﷽✍  #Story 

πŸ“Œ  UAE (DPWorld ) betrayal in Sudan.


.Al-Burhan is a national hero of the Sudanese people. 

He saved his country from a major conspiracy" DPWorld " to divide it and plunder its resources. 

He is a man of great understanding and high awareness.

He is surrounded by valuable men who sacrifice everything for their country.

He has long felt the threat of the Dacmu Sariic militia and the evil government of the UAE.

 He has proposed that the RSF be integrated into the national army and that the country have a single army.

This was not something that Hameeti and his followers in the UAE could accept.

The UAE was to invest $6 billion in a port near Port Sudan.

Sudan later withdrew from the deal.

Dpworld "UAE" wants the Dacmu Saric force to become the Sudanese navy and protect the port, Sudan's Red Sea shipping, and strategic facilities.

He rejected Abdifatah Al-Burhan and understood what was going on.

He said that the UAE has only one navy in Sudan. The Dacmu Saric Navy has nothing to do with the coast guard.

Abdifatah Al-Burhan has been wounded 6 times in Sudan, he believes in his country.


He recently said that the Sudanese people will not forget for a thousand years what those who supported the rebels did to them.

He was referring to the UAE


Tuesday, June 10, 2025

How Qatar funded extremists in Syria

                     


 How Qatar funded extremists in Syria

-------------------------------

The Syrian National Coalition was Qatar’s brainchild and was given a warm welcome in Doha!!


Damascus: According to The Financial Times, Qatar spent over $3 billion (Dh11 billion) to $4 billion in funding the Syria war and has paid up to $50,000 per year to defectors from the Syrian army and their families. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimated that over 70 weapons cargo flights were made within 12 months, carrying Qatari arms to Syrian rebels between April 2012 and March 2013. The Syrian National Council (SNC), the main political opposition, was Qatar’s brainchild and was given a warm welcome in Doha, where it allowed its leadership to use the building of the shuttered Syrian embassy to operate.

It also gave the SNC Syria’s official seat during the Arab League Summit in 2013, which Doha hosted.

When the SNC was founded, Qatar’s main contact was Mustafa Al Sabbagh, a construction businessman turned secretary-general of the National Coalition who used to write cheques for Syrian fighters and opposition members from his base in Doha.


Months later, the Saudis managed to wrestle control of the Syrian coalition from Qatar’s grip, alarmed by the rising presence of the Muslim Brotherhood in its top ranks, most being long-time proteges of the Qatari leadership.

Saudi Arabia was worried by the election of Mohammad Mursi in Cairo, and feared another Mursi in Damascus.

In early 2016, the Saudis created a broader coalition comprising senior figures called the Higher Negotiations Committee (HNC) headed by ex-Syrian prime minister Riad Hijab, a Baathist, tasked with leading the opposition in the UN-mandated Geneva talks.


The Saudis reached out to a wider spectrum of Syrian figures, ranging from Kurds and Arab nationalists to former Baathists and Islamists, but were always cautious about dealing with the Brotherhood, despite assurances from its deputy chief Farouk Tayfour, who when meeting then-Saudi foreign minister Saud Al Faisal, that they would be different from their Egyptian comrades if they ever reached power in Syria.

Most members of the Syrian Brotherhood still reside in Qatar and are frequent guests on Al Jazeera, while figures like Riad Hijab live in Doha but handle all their business meetings in Riyadh — a balancing act made all the more difficult after Saudi Arabia suspended all airline flights to Qatar and closed off its land border with Doha, accusing its Emir of cuddling up to the Iranians and working with a broad coalition of terrorist groups, headed by the Muslim Brotherhood. The SNC official political opposition, has been noticeably quiet amid the unfolding Qatar crisis. “The crisis will likely cast a heavy shadow on the SNC,” Akram Khuzam, former bureau chief for Al Jazeera in Moscow, told Gulf News.

Khuzam, who parted ways years ago with the controversial TV station, says the SNC will be watching whether Qatar pivots completely towards Iran — a country which backs militias in Syria fighting the opposition.

In Syria, pro-government activists on social media networks are gloating over the ostracisation of Qatar.

State-run television in Damascus is giving the story prime coverage — so are pro-Hezbollah outlets like Al Mayadeen, or their official mouthpiece, Al Manar TV.

Members of the opposition, however, are refusing to take sides — waiting to see how the crisis will unfold.

All Qatar-backed Syrian politicians approached by Gulf News have refused to comment. Hassan Hassan, a Senior Fellow at the Washington-based Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, told Gulf News that even before the Qatar crisis, Saudi Arabia promised to work with the US to undermine Islamists in Syria.

“I predict the Syrian opposition will further splinter as a result of the Qatar crisis,” George Qadr, a Syrian writer in the Netherlands told Gulf News.

“Rebel groups backed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar could wage war against each other, instead of against the government,” he added.


Months later, the Saudis managed to wrestle control of the Syrian coalition from Qatar’s grip, alarmed by the rising presence of the Muslim Brotherhood in its top ranks, most being long-time proteges of the Qatari leadership. 

Saudi Arabia was worried by the election of Mohammad Mursi in Cairo, and feared another Mursi in Damascus. 

In early 2016, the Saudis created a broader coalition comprising senior figures called the Higher Negotiations Committee (HNC) headed by ex-Syrian prime minister Riad Hijab, a Baathist, tasked with leading the opposition in the UN-mandated Geneva talks.


The Saudis reached out to a wider spectrum of Syrian figures, ranging from Kurds and Arab nationalists to former Baathists and Islamists, but were always cautious about dealing with the Brotherhood, despite assurances from its deputy chief Farouk Tayfour, who when meeting then-Saudi foreign minister Saud Al Faisal, that they would be different from their Egyptian comrades if they ever reached power in Syria. 

Most members of the Syrian Brotherhood still reside in Qatar and are frequent guests on Al Jazeera, while figures like Riad Hijab live in Doha but handle all their business meetings in Riyadh — a balancing act made all the more difficult after Saudi Arabia suspended all airline flights to Qatar and closed off its land border with Doha, accusing its Emir of cuddling up to the Iranians and working with a broad coalition of terrorist groups, headed by the Muslim Brotherhood. The SNC official political opposition, has been noticeably quiet amid the unfolding Qatar crisis. “The crisis will likely cast a heavy shadow on the SNC,” Akram Khuzam, former bureau chief for Al Jazeera in Moscow, told Gulf News.

Khuzam, who parted ways years ago with the controversial TV station, says the SNC will be watching whether Qatar pivots completely towards Iran — a country which backs militias in Syria fighting the opposition. 

In Syria, pro-government activists on social media networks are gloating over the ostracisation of Qatar.

State-run television in Damascus is giving the story prime coverage — so are pro-Hezbollah outlets like Al Mayadeen, or their official mouthpiece, Al Manar TV. 

Members of the opposition, however, are refusing to take sides — waiting to see how the crisis will unfold. 

All Qatar-backed Syrian politicians approached by Gulf News have refused to comment. Hassan Hassan, a Senior Fellow at the Washington-based Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy, told Gulf News that even before the Qatar crisis, Saudi Arabia promised to work with the US to undermine Islamists in Syria. 

“I predict the Syrian opposition will further splinter as a result of the Qatar crisis,” George Qadr, a Syrian writer in the Netherlands told Gulf News.

“Rebel groups backed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar could wage war against each other, instead of against the government,” he added.

Tuesday, May 13, 2025

#UAE#Shenanigans

              


﷽ ✍ #UAE#Shenanigans


Puntland’s Lithium Reserve: A $240 Billion Investment Opportunity

A UAE-backed geological survey in Puntland, Somalia, has confirmed the presence of approximately 12 million metric tonnes of lithium in the Majiyahan–Dalan region. This positions Puntland as a future player in the global critical minerals market.


Lithium Demand and Market Value

Lithium is essential for electric vehicles, battery storage, and renewable energy systems. As of May 2025, lithium carbonate prices range between $11,000 and $20,000 per tonne, valuing Puntland’s reserve between $132 billion and $240 billion. Global demand is rising sharply, while supply remains constrained.


Strategic Advantages

Puntland lies near major trade routes via the Gulf of Aden, offering direct maritime access to Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. The region benefits from stable local governance, early international interest, and confirmed geological potential.


Requirements for Investment

Unlocking this opportunity requires clear mining laws, enforceable contracts, reliable infrastructure, and environmental and community safeguards. Puntland’s government is signaling readiness to welcome foreign partnerships aligned with sustainable practices.


Investor Outlook

This is a rare ground-floor entry point into a high-value, underexplored market. Early investors can help shape extraction policy, secure long-term supply, and build trust. The potential is real, the resource is confirmed, and Puntland is ready.